News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by Havoc on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:02PM (#11416940)
There is a reason why it all seems so oddly ancient. Rule number 1 - if its not broken then don't fix it. Not the usual hn mindset I know, but you only need to be involved in one bad transition between finance systems to know that it can be a huge shtstorm. Big enough to kill a company. That is why everyone is running ancient mainframe era tech and everything feels like its 10 year behind silicon valley mindset.

Its all good & well on a small business scale to DIY and integrate things hacker style but beyond that the actual accounting problems become big enough that you don't want the latest flashy gimmick adding potential unknowns. Its kinda like you don't run nightly builds on your production server.

As for the formats & integration - yeah not great. What you're looking for is essentially EDI, but there isn't a market for it on that scale. Its also still fairly fragmented so only works on an enterprise scale (i.e. BMW tell all its suppliers they are to use X standard).

Unfortunately in my experience (auditor) the more people try to hack together a solution the worse the end result. I've had to tell a CFO that all of their numbers from top to bottom are bad because they custom rolled a key component and the people that did so missed a subtle accounting nuance. Cost them a fortune to fix it. So yeah by all means go automate data transfer but please don't attempt to implement any actual accounting logic. Its like a airline pilot attempting surgery (or a surgeon flying an airliner). Neither even realises they're making a mistake until its too late.

Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by jwhitlark on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:22PM (#11417028)
Building accounting systems is a lot like building distributed systems. It's not too hard to get something that looks like it's working, then blows up badly in production.
Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by IshKebab on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:09PM (#11416968)
It seems to me the bigger reason is that the best people to fix it are the ones with the biggest incentive not to.
Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by Havoc on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:22PM (#11417026)
> ones with the biggest incentive not to

Not really. The bank stuff (where they are REALLY still running ancient mainframes) is not changing because its a bureaucracy and they're super risk averse. And every year the conclusion is the same - limp along for another year. Plus there are cases where the tech is so old that its essentially a black box at this stage.

On the authors scale - they're are few people that have the necessary odd combination of skills (accounting & programming). And those that do don't spend their time writing SME software...they work on enterprise scale stuff.

As for no incentive to fix it - trust me nobody likes paper invoices. Not even bookkeepers. Everyone's life would be easier if there was a widely adopted standardized system in place.

Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by toyg on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:18PM (#11417009)
Accountants usualy don't write the legislation they have to follow. In that sense, they have no incentive one way or the other.

If you mean that the incentive is for companies to get legislation vague enough that it can be bent in different ways, I might agree, but even if they wanted to, it's really difficult to find a common way to account for both multinational biotech companies and individual stallholders in Chattanooga TN.

Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by ambicapter on Sunday April 03, 2016 @07:03PM (#11418244)
If we follow your reasoning you could say that about any profession.