It also fails to understand and accommodate intersectionality needs with respect to cognitive diversity.

Related reading:

Tact Filter: http://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html

Ozark English: http://ozarque.livejournal.com/176349.html

When Nerds Collide: https://medium.com/@maradydd/when-nerds-collide-31895b01e68c

Thanks for the great reads and a fresh perspective (to me)

I'm okay with it, because I can get a job elsewhere. Some minorities can't. I don't need to be able to get a job at GitHub, because for some stupid reason, society has a general bias in favor of me. I can work anywhere, but the folks they're giving a shot are folks who don't have it as good as I do.

If this continues to proliferate, instead of achieving a World where minorities have equal opportunity with non-minorities, we will instead end up with a mix of institutions where those in the majority have an advantage and other institutions where those who are minorities have an advantage. This doesn't look like equality, but a reversion to something looking like "separate but equal".

Every human being should be judged for the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

The law disagrees with you. I can very easily see Github on the losing side of workplace racial discrimination claim here.

I wish your world existed. It doesn't, however, and minority groups need advantages over me in order to get the kinds of jobs I can get.

I hope we can move past this some day, but that's not happening today.

What a load of tosh. Are there no disadvantaged people in America with light coloured skin?

Because of their skin color? No.

For other reasons? Yeah. They get help too, though.

Poor and middle class white people are a figment of your imagination. West Virginia basically is Narnia.