>Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding: > ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’

Coded language for sanctioned discrimination.

Related reading:

Tact Filter: http://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html

Ozark English: http://ozarque.livejournal.com/176349.html

When Nerds Collide: https://medium.com/@maradydd/when-nerds-collide-31895b01e68c

The law disagrees with you. I can very easily see Github on the losing side of workplace racial discrimination claim here.

I hope we can move past this some day, but that's not happening today.

For other reasons? Yeah. They get help too, though.

I'm just glad I dumped Github. I'm pretty sure they'd find my white female friends [some of whom needed to transition] being discriminated against as okay based on those slides.

You shouldn't be generalizing on race if you want me to believe that.

Honest question: does it have to be directed by "a privileged ethnic group" or is it valid if it is by any general group or even a single, privileged person?

That said, I'm no academic, but I remember reading something about this a few years ago, in the case of a woman in France accused of anti-white racism.