And yep, the first part about using panels was very much inspired by 10/GUI. I am linking to that concept on the website, and also talked to Clayton Miller before publishing Desktop Neo.
Maybe the your article needs to immediately clarify who you are and the intent of the design, and maybe differentiate between your design intended for producers vs. consumers.
Thanks for share!
Does the kind of large multitouch surface with flyover support needed by 10/GUI actually exist? Because I think I want one.
Interesting. I have the opposite impression. I think _customization_ is the key for real productivity. The more customizable the system the more productive I can be with it.
Phones and Tablets are easier to use as long as we deal not with more than two apps at a time. The Neo GUI is an interesting idea but what productivity for? As for me, I prefer a window pager where I can address any window instantly with just one mouse click. Swapping between several pages all the time would confuse me.
> "Windows are now inefficient and incompatible with modern productivity interfaces. ... "Window Management is Outdated"."
No, surely not. I would always prefer a PC with a customizable GUI (KDE and OpenBox for instance). I barely use my phone and pad because they are only useful for basic things.
Isn't this the kind of thinking behind Windows 8?
"We now use smartphones and tablets most of the time, since they are much easier to use."
No. Just no. I don't want to use a touchscreen and closed ecosystem to develop software. That would be a nightmare.
The rest of the design seems to be taken straight from 10/GUI.