News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by k__ on Monday January 11, 2016 @12:12PM (#10881659)
They were always talking about their "bare metal" visualization, I thought they could virtualize CPUs too.
Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by krylon on Monday January 11, 2016 @01:20PM (#10882071)
You can run virtual machines in z/VM, but you can also partition the machine at the firmware level. (Partitions are called "Logical Partitions" or LPARs.) Maybe that was what they meant by "bare metal virtualization".
Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by cbd1984 on Monday January 11, 2016 @04:01PM (#10883484)
Virtualization and emulation are not the same thing. You can have one without the other.

(Traditionally, virtualization precluded emulation: The hypervisor simply multiplexed hardware, and the guests got what looked like raw access to the real hardware, with no way of "seeing" the hypervisor at all. Very secure, very simple, and you could run a hypervisor as a guest with guests under it, recursively.)

Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by wmf on Monday January 11, 2016 @02:26PM (#10882603)
Emulation is never going to be fast.
Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by rodgerd on Monday January 11, 2016 @03:44PM (#10883351)
Sure it is. The s390x instruction set is microcode emulation on top of a POWER-derived microarchitecture, just as modern x86 chips are microcode on an underlying microarch.
Re:IBM ported Go to s390x mainframes by filereaper on Monday January 11, 2016 @08:24PM (#10884933)
Completely wrong. s390x runs on its own dedicated hardware, it is not emulated on POWER. POWER and s390x are completely separate.

source: worked at IBM on their compilers team.