News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by dang on Monday December 07, 2015 @03:05PM (#10692265)
Previous discussions of Pullum's critique of Strunk and White:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=557618

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=566335

Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by billybilly1920 on Monday December 07, 2015 @06:47PM (#10693709)
the second link is the bestester of the too.
Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by mcnamaratw on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @08:10AM (#10696086)
Looks like a bunch of good points held together by diatribe. S&W is a good book. The list of errata would be more helpful without the ranting.

Example: Prescriptive grammar didn't rely so much on evidence. That's a truism that (a) doesn't tell us much about E.B. White's personal character flaws ("arrogance"), and (b) leaves us awfully starry-eyed and idealistic about the downsides of descriptive grammar. Who knows what they'll say about us in fifty years?

Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by cbd1984 on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @06:57AM (#10695884)
Pullum, the author, is a regular contributor to Language Log, which is highly recommended.

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/

Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by jjgreen on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @06:30AM (#10695798)
Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by cbd1984 on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @06:53AM (#10695866)
Wasn't broken to begin with.
Re:The Land of the Free and “The Elements of Style” (2010) [... by jjgreen on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @07:09AM (#10695921)
Depends on whether you think one should follow Mr Strunk and Mr White (plural) or their book (singular). It always irked me that PEP8 insisted that you become a stalker.