Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by acd on Monday November 30, 2015 @03:41AM
(#10648426)
Same in Sweden, why is a storage vendor more liable than a CPU or memory vendor?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by function_seven on Monday November 30, 2015 @03:55AM
(#10648458)
Devil's Advocate:
The storage device is where the copy of the copyrighted media resides. The CPU, speakers, headphones, video display, RAM, etc. are all transitory in their involvement of piracy; but the hard drive/USB stick is "where" the violation is taking place.
Again, devil's advocate here! This is mostly a thought exercise.
Related: http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23
Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by Natanael_L on Monday November 30, 2015 @04:45AM
(#10648587)
Some media companies have tried to sue switch makers over the fact that their switches temporarily hold copies of the sent media in their cache without a license.
Related: http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/issues-paper/caching-ind... http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_5znwT8... http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/issues-paper/caching-ind... http://www.pcworld.com/article/2036961/belgian-isps-sued-for...
Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by Confusion on Monday November 30, 2015 @04:55AM
(#10648613)
So what if you watch the film shortly after download and remove it immediately after viewing? Transitory -> not instrumental in enabling piracy?
Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by spost on Monday November 30, 2015 @01:14PM
(#10650776)
Or even more directly, download to a ramdisk.
Re:Swedish court: 'We cannot ban Pirate Bay'
by stpe on Monday November 30, 2015 @04:29AM
(#10648532)
Looking forward to the upcoming documentary COPYGATE - A documentary about Copyswede that is addressing this.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/danielbramme/copygate