First Timers Only

Re:First Timers Only by ant6n on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @08:52AM (#10627138)

As a bit of a nitpick, I find it slightly ironic that this article uses TDD and PR as unexplained abbreviations.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by kentcdodds on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @10:14AM (#10627563)

Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the post

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by crottypeter on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @09:03AM (#10627196)

TDD is acceptable as it is the top search result for TDD. PR on the other hand ...

Acronyms and abbreviations with well defined / well known alternative meanings really bug me.

Actually Acronyms and abbreviations bug me full stop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by ant6n on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @09:32AM (#10627312)

Well, I googled both, which kinda bugs the flow of reading the article. Abbreviations bug me too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by ithinkso on Thursday November 26, 2015 @02:26PM (#10634330)

Well, what about RAM, PC and so on? They might be an extreme example but if you are in the 'field' not using abbreviations may actually bug you more. Targeting audience is not an easy task.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by yoha on Saturday November 28, 2015 @08:50AM (#10641046)

It is often better to use “computer” and “memory”, especially when the distinction between L1/L2/L3/RAM/SSD/HDD is not the main topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by ant6n on Thursday November 26, 2015 @05:42PM (#10635078)

Didn't have to google RAM, PC and so on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First Timers Only by rcraggs on Friday December 04, 2015 @04:20PM (#10679215)

The people who will benefit from this article most are people who lead OSS projects, so I don't think it's too much of a problem to use these.

[ Parent | on HN ]