News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

lemoneyeo

Re:If you get sued in the US, "eDiscovery" can cost $1M on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @08:52AM (#37998482)
This is completely messed up and puts Tyler as a hostage to pay the settlement

Companies that IPO'd in the first year

I was researching Xero for an article and saw that it IPO'd within year 1. It's very unusual. Usually, it takes 8-10 years to go public and up to 9 months to prepare for IPO. I've decided to research if there any other examples like that and found a few:1/ Xero: accounting soft • Founded: 2006 • IPO: 2007 It IPO'ed soon because it needed $15M for growth, but there wasn't any VC ecosystem in...

( Read More... | no comments | 3 points | on HN )
Re:Roast My Landing Page on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @10:11AM (#35261260)
What would you cut?
Re:Roast My Landing Page on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @09:08AM (#35260424)
Thank you
Re:Roast My Landing Page on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @09:08AM (#35260420)
Thank you for feedback. Did you load it from the mobile or desktop?
Re:Roast My Landing Page on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @09:07AM (#35260412)
Not change it. Optimize.

Roast My Landing Page

I’m optimising the homepage lemon.io and need the help of the community.We are targeting startups and the visual brand and tone of voice played a good role in our growth. I see there are a lot of things that make me doubt it.Our conversion is a bit below of I would expect. I’m building a list of assumptions that will test within the next 3 months.Looking for feedback on: • copy • design •...

( Read More... | 10 comments | 4 points | on HN )
Re:Show HN: Get a Professional Headshot in Minutes with AI on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @09:33AM (#35245855)
Love the product
Re:Why We Ship the Most Code on Friday on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @10:13PM (#34605860)
>> maintain the lowest incident rate on Saturday

I make my team stay off Slack on weekends. Unless there is major incident. So would not ship on Friday to risk having them fix the lowest incidents.

Re:Why We Ship the Most Code on Friday on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @10:11PM (#34605838)
I know the founder, he pivoted to something else. https://twitter.com/KennethCassel
Re:What fast-growing startups are still under the radar? on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @08:32AM (#34594789)
I wish you could lol

What fast-growing startups are still under the radar?

- cohere.ai is a NLP platform, their usage grew 800% in '22.- corecircle (https://twitter.com/corecircle) is a social fitness app. In year 1, they grew to 300K users, and $1M rev.- doola.com helps to open a co in the US. In '22, they grew 9x.- partiful.com is an event platform (which I've used myself). 10x # of events from Jan'22.- speak.com is an AI language learning platform.- stage.in is an...

( Read More... | 4 comments | 12 points | on HN )
Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @12:39PM (#34521414)
haha, thanks. Lack of focus is the biggest constraint, true.

Also, I think it's better to validate with in-house talent, even though I see a lot of MVP built through us.

Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @12:10PM (#34520976)
I didn't think it's important, but will add the resources to the article. Thanks for the feedback.
Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @12:08PM (#34520947)
Great find. Thanks for sharing.
Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @12:06PM (#34520926)
It requires a lot of capital. Most of them fail. One of the startup studio founders told me it's hard to fundraise for the studio even if you are successful
Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @11:17AM (#34520133)
I saw 2 types of studios - that incubate their own ideas and bring founders to operate them. Here founders don't have the large stake, but it's not their idea and resources - that bring outside founders with ideas. Here founders retain big part of equity.
Re:Startup studios that created billions in value on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @11:01AM (#34519901)
Hey, I got it from public resources, nothing made up. Can you, please, share what studio did I get wrong?
Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:50AM (#34428197)
- Go to the agency when you clearly know what needs to be built -

User stories, jobs to be done, roadmap or design: whatever specification you have. Otherwise, much of the code will be thrown away. Same rules work for marketing agencies. If you don’t know your users and positioning, none of the agencies will do marketing for you.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:49AM (#34428179)
- Check out the background before shortlisting -

Start with research: find testimonials or real products the agency helped build. Check the “Showcase” section on the website. Open Trustpilot & G2. The more previous experience you can see, the better.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:48AM (#34428171)
- Ask for a consultation before you commit to anything -

Meeting the team can help you check the fit before starting the project. If you’re looking for a dev agency, chat with developers beforehand. Soft skills are as critical as ability to code. Avoid working with agencies that underpay their developers.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:47AM (#34428158)
- Really, get to know the developers -

Ensure that the developers assigned to your project are the ones actually doing the work. Be sure, the dev is fairly paid.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:47AM (#34428154)
- Draft the specification -

Spend time scoping the development, UI or QA tasks or ask for just scope beforehand. Having clear requirements will help you manage the costs.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:47AM (#34428151)
- Start small & provide feedback -

Figure out if you can get the small commitment from the beginning. Focus on delivering a smaller MVP with the ability to change developers on the way (if it gets stuck). Get iterations with user feedback as early as possible to ensure you’re moving in the right direction. Move in short sprints. Pay for milestones.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:46AM (#34428142)
- Keep the decision-making in-house -

Make sure you have the technical co-founder or CTO to make the macro decisions. If you don’t want to include someone full-time, you can get started with a fractional CTO. Don’t outsource strategy.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:45AM (#34428119)
- Ask for replacement policy -

Verify that the agency has a replacement policy in case of bad hires or other issues. Have an agreement that outlines who owns the right to the product and the associated intellectual property.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:45AM (#34428109)
- Hire the agency that’s a good fit for your style -

Pick the team that uses the same development approach, has remote culture, shares similar values and you’d generally like to hang out with those people.

Re:Pitfalls to avoid when working with agencies on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @10:45AM (#34428102)
- Protect your idea -

Include code ownership into the contract. Outline that you own the right to the product and the associated intellectual property.

Older »