News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

decentralisedog

Re:Using Matrix to replace proprietary and centralized chat apps on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:48PM (#25097045)
Matrix has always supported "Guest" accounts, where a user can immediately join a room and start talking in there with a generated user_id. They have limitations, but for the "get going straight away" factor it was quite nice.

Element (back when we called it Riot) removed support for this a while ago BUT we are trying to design it back into the app, which you can follow https://github.com/vector-im/element-web/issues/9264

And yeah as a developer on the project, getting users into rooms quickly and chatting is a desperate goal of mine.

Re:Using Matrix to replace proprietary and centralized chat apps on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:41PM (#25097015)
You might be interested in https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-s3-storage-provider, which provides S3 storage options for Synapse.

I personally run https://github.com/turt2live/matrix-media-repo/ which is basically a media server written in Go which has lots of bells and whistles for rentention, storage platforms and scaling.

Re:Using Matrix to replace proprietary and centralized chat apps on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:40PM (#25097007)
While Matrix definitely tries to appeal to IRC users, it's absolutely not just a IRC replacement. It's been a conscious decision from Day 1 that history is important given that the default for any messaging system today is to store history. Honestly it feels like a massive improvement over the days of bouncers and logs hosted in the cloud.

That all being said, there are ways to make your rooms drop history if you wish through the config (and I believe it can be configured per room too).

Re:Using Matrix to replace proprietary and centralized chat apps on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:31PM (#25096977)
I've never used the feature on Matrix because as you say, it doesn't really apply. Matrix (or really Element here) doesn't require you to use an identity server at all, so I don't really think it invalidates the protocol in a meaningful way.
Re:Using Matrix to replace proprietary and centralized chat apps on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:25PM (#25096948)
Yep, it exists as https://p2p.riot.im/! The team is making tons of progress including the new pinecone project. It regularly gets talked about in https://matrix.org/blog/posts if you want to keep up to date.
Re:Combating abuse without backdoors on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @05:44AM (#24835488)
So the good news here is we're working on "implementation guides" which are basically developer friendly documentation on how to do X rather than a raw technical spec. I don't recall if it's actually hosted anywhere just yet, but you can see the progress in https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix.org/tree/master/impleme...
Re:Gitter is joining Matrix on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:00PM (#24640928)
The short term plan is to replace the existing (rather rubbish) Gitter<->Matrix bridge with a fully featured bridge that seamlessly bridges between Gitter and Matrix.

The long term plan folding gitter.im features into Element and Gitter users will migrate to using Element and Matrix.

Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision on Thursday December 19, 2019 @04:30PM (#21839542)
Mozilla will no doubt use their own domain name, and would have the option to go self hosted if they wish to.

Moving synapse databases around isn't too difficult, and certainly Modular.im would be able to provide the data on request.

Re:Open Startups List on Sunday August 11, 2019 @10:17AM (#20668265)
It's mentioned half-way down the blogpost (https://hackernoon.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-an-open-start...)

>There’s no official definition yet, and the Oxford dictionary weren’t available for comment, so let’s write one; A product or company which operates in the open and shares their statistics publicly.