Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by mooreds on Thursday July 30, 2015 @07:20PM
(#9978911)
Did they move to SF?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by austenallred on Thursday July 30, 2015 @07:26PM
(#9978946)
They have 7 people in SF and 45 in Utah
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by pkulak on Thursday July 30, 2015 @08:00PM
(#9979088)
That's how you do it. Rent a tiny space in SF for your token SF people, then open offices in Portland, Boulder, Austin, etc. You're still an SF company, but your runway is twice as long as everyone else's.
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by mooreds on Thursday July 30, 2015 @08:38PM
(#9979241)
This strategy needs a name. Maybe "The SF funding tentacle"?
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by ectoplasm on Thursday July 30, 2015 @08:43PM
(#9979267)
"Bait and switch"?
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by DannoHung on Thursday July 30, 2015 @09:24PM
(#9979398)
The East Texas Shuffle
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by dctoedt on Friday July 31, 2015 @06:40AM
(#9980992)
Austin is considered Central Texas.
(East Texas is famous, or notorious, as where patent trolls like to file their lawsuits.)
Re:Landlords are trying not to rent to startups in San Franc...
by DannoHung on Friday July 31, 2015 @05:12PM
(#9984524)
Yeah, I was riffing on the idea of finding a favorable municipality for business reasons and actually running your company where you actually want to run it.
Although given the history of this sort of thing, I guess it'd be more appropriate to call it the Maryland Shuffle.