Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by AaronFriel on Friday June 26, 2015 @02:54PM
(#9786935)
I'm not a lawyer, but a few come to mind. Vandalism, destruction of property? Employees don't have free reign to... ahem, defecate where they please at work just by virtue of being an employee.
Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by tzs on Friday June 26, 2015 @08:06PM
(#9788453)
If someone had peered upon the person pooping, the proprietor would presumably not have proceeded to procure the DNA to try to pinpoint the perpetrator. They could have prevailed upon the peeper to peg the punk.
Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by jamessb on Friday June 26, 2015 @04:28PM
(#9787526)
In the UK, Damian Ayles was convicted for defecating on his neighbour's doorstep (as well as posting the faeces through a letterbox and smearing it on a car). He was ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work and pay £350 in compensation and £85 costs: http://metro.co.uk/2015/03/25/phantom-dumper-caught-pooing-o...
Apparently there was both DNA and CCTV evidence in the case.
Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by s73v3r on Friday June 26, 2015 @02:38PM
(#9786802)
As the case shows, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that a company should be allowed to compel an employee to surrender their genetic material.
Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by krallja on Friday June 26, 2015 @05:35PM
(#9787889)
From the article:
"The law does include limited exemptions, however. Forensic laboratories can ask workers for their DNA to check that employees' genetic material does not contaminate the genetic samples that they analyse."
Re:'Devious Defecator' case is a landmark for US genetic-pri...
by JasonFruit on Friday June 26, 2015 @04:13PM
(#9787446)
The judge in the case, Amy Totenberg, is the sister of the journalist Nina Totenberg, both of whom are daughters of the remarkable violinist Roman Totenberg. What an illustrious family!
I couldn't resist
You can be fired for doing something that does not break a law. Police are restricted to investigating cases where a law is broken.
Apparently there was both DNA and CCTV evidence in the case.
"The law does include limited exemptions, however. Forensic laboratories can ask workers for their DNA to check that employees' genetic material does not contaminate the genetic samples that they analyse."
There were a series of serial shower poopings that happened at Twitter several years ago. The perpetrator(s?) were never caught.
She must be a Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys fan.