News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Atom 1.0 by lvillani on Thursday June 25, 2015 @12:39PM (#9779153)
It highly depends on your usage pattern.

I usually have one long-lived instance of an editor for the project/thing I'm focusing on, but I also frequently fire up "temporary" instances for one-off editing jobs, from the terminal.

The difference between, let's say, "subl ." (launch Sublime Text in the current directory) and "atom ." is staggering: Sublime Text starts instantly with a boatload of plugins; Atom starts nearly instantaneously but then takes around 5 seconds to become usable, without plugins, after repeated runs.

(Speaking of specs, I'm on a late 2013 Retina MacBook Pro, 16 GB of RAM)

Re:Atom 1.0 by MozMorris on Thursday June 25, 2015 @05:13PM (#9780945)
Yup, that is totally where it is slow. Would be great if they could nail that.

I must be more tolerable to that startup time, perhaps I've even become used to it.

Re:Atom 1.0 by rplnt on Friday June 26, 2015 @04:30AM (#9783008)
I never close my text editor (ST2 that is). Why would I do that? So I guess Atom is not for me then?