News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by pdeuchler on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @02:09PM (#9773374)
I'm glad things ended well for you, but please realize that you were freed thanks to luck and not because you were actually innocent.

Don't ever talk to police. DON'T EVER TALK TO POLICE.

Call a lawyer and allow him to explain the mistake. There's just as much chance that the police could have used your explanation against you if they thought you were lying and you would be in jail right now, wrongfully convicted because you misremembered a small detail in your story.

DON'T EVER TALK TO POLICE, ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE BEEN EXPLICITLY CHARGED WITH A CRIME.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by dang on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @03:42PM (#9773995)
"Please don't use uppercase for emphasis. If you want to emphasize a word or phrase, put asterisks around it and it will get italicized."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @03:47PM (#9774031)
Thanks! I'm guilty as charged. Will reform.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by switch007 on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @05:08PM (#9774487)
I think that was a justified breaking of the rules.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by krapp on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @09:20PM (#9775462)
Commenting with emphasis in all caps is the textual equivalent of grabbing someone by the collar and screaming in their face.

Everyone who does so feels it's justified, but the effect is always obnoxious and it never conveys more information or meaning, only an insistence that the commenter is especially important and needs to be paid attention to.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by switch007 on Thursday June 25, 2015 @01:32AM (#9776137)
Very common way people try and "win" on the Internet is by arguing a point not made by the parent. It wasn't all in upper case; your comment is invalid.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by krapp on Thursday June 25, 2015 @09:51AM (#9777842)
It's been considered rude since the days of Usenet and probably before, and whether or not the comment was entirely in all caps is irrelevant.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by ran290 on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @05:14PM (#9774534)
Hi dang, this is unrelated (feel free to remove this reply) but it seems that my post at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9774037 has disapeared? Could you look into it?
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by dang on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @09:07PM (#9775418)
Comments by new accounts are autokilled if they trip certain filters that we have in place because of past abuse by spammers and trolls. I've unkilled your comment and marked your account legit so it won't happen again.

Soon, everyone will be able to contribute to unkilling good comments, so fixing these will no longer block on moderator attention. In the future, though, everyone: please send issues like this to [email protected]. It's too random whether we'll see it on HN itself! Not to mention off topic.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by lifeformed on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @05:15PM (#9774537)
Honest question: is everyone supposed to have a lawyer on standby? Who exactly am I supposed to call if I need one in this kind of emergency situation? Do I just look in a phone book for "lawyers"?
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by dredmorbius on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @06:56PM (#9775026)
That, or calling your local bar association's referral line. Some cities and courts have low cost legal assistance either through government agencies or via nonprofits.

Better yet, spend 30 minutes on that exercise now, rather than when you're stuck in the situation for real.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by bsder on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @06:52PM (#9775011)
How can you say this, and not include a link to the video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

This video explains perfectly why even if you are innocent, you should not talk to the police.

Might want to edit your post.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by tim333 on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @03:01PM (#9773716)
I think you may be thinking of the US? In the UK it's pretty rare to prosecute the innocent. If anything things are a bit lenient with a quite a few criminals getting off free.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by twic on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @08:15PM (#9775256)
> In the UK it's pretty rare to prosecute the innocent.

Really?

When i did jury duty, probably about a third of the charges i heard were pretty obviously groundless.

Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by bediger4000 on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @07:44PM (#9775168)
As Thomas Jefferson once wrote, "Better a hundred guilty men go free, than one innocent man is prosecuted without due process of law." Oh, wait....
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by pdeuchler on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @03:18PM (#9773843)
I don't think human nature changes drastically between politically defined boundaries. Besides, a simple google search shows roughly the same proportion of innocents convicted per trial.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by anigbrowl on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @05:01PM (#9774441)
Bear in mind that those statistics are enormously skewed by plea bargaining, for both good and bad reasons. Good plea bargaining is where the evidence is extremely strong and the defendant has little criminal history, so admitting guilt and serving a minimal sentence is in everyone's interest. The bad kind is where prosecutors have a weak case but bring so many charges that defendant is facing a horrendously long time in prison, and pleads guilty to a crime that wasn't committed rather than take the risk of extended incarceration.
Re:A man who was jailed on the fantasy evidence of a single ... by tim333 on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @05:41PM (#9774683)
Human nature's probably much the same but the systems and their incentives seem pretty different.