Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by greenyoda on Thursday May 28, 2015 @12:16AM
(#9616038)
Property being seized under a legitimate search warrant is very different from property being stolen. Trying to hide property or documents from a legal seizure can result in criminal charges such as obstruction of justice.
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by akhatri_aus on Thursday May 28, 2015 @02:07AM
(#9616306)
And if it's not stolen and seized using a legal warrant and you're not permitted to control it?
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by spacehome on Thursday May 28, 2015 @12:15AM
(#9616037)
The really clever way to encrypt your drives is to make the passphrase for the drive decrypt a very small (512-bit) header that contains the decryption key for the rest of the drive. Then wiping the drive consists of just erasing those critical bits quickly.
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by contingencies on Thursday May 28, 2015 @12:48AM
(#9616113)
Except that erasure on modern drives rarely actually erases things...
If your property is stolen and taken without your permission, and you can control it - why aren't you entitled to destroy it?
I suppose it depends on the legality and force of the order to seize; but if it did not include an order to the owner, I posit they were within their natural rights to delete their data.