News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FIFA Officials Arrested on Corruption Charges; Face Extra... by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @02:06PM (#9613209)
In one case (slander) you say it as if its true. In the other its qualified. They are very different! Be fair.
Re:FIFA Officials Arrested on Corruption Charges; Face Extra... by supergirl on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @02:28PM (#9613375)
Then I can just say "I think someone can prove that [slander statement]" and I'm safe? Without seeing any evidence how can you tell if it's slander or not?
Re:FIFA Officials Arrested on Corruption Charges; Face Extra... by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @02:32PM (#9613411)
Hm. The definition is "Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation." So really, if it injures someone then its slander. Sounds like your initial idea was right - even implying wrongdoing could be slander.
Re:FIFA Officials Arrested on Corruption Charges; Face Extra... by austenallred on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @02:41PM (#9613469)
The key word here is "false." Saying "X is being accused of" is or "X allegedly" is not a false statement, and that's why the qualification matters. Nothing said in the post(s) above was false, and therefore none of it is slander.