News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by ceejayoz on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @01:54PM (#9540708)
> Regulations aren't even needed some buildings are just taking care of this issue on their own.

Some buildings won't take care of it (especially in situations where people are buying whole buildings to rent out), leaving their neighbors without much recourse without regulation.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by shampine on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @01:58PM (#9540741)
Oh I know this is true and I definitely didn't mean it as a blanket statement. But it seems for most of the historic core neighborhood that the buildings are enforcing their own leases/rules.
Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by chatmasta on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @02:09PM (#9540836)
If people are buying whole buildings to rent out, what argument do the neighbors have for shutting down airbnb activity?

I understand the argument for apartment buildings. If someone in your building buys/rents a unit, then puts it on airbnb, they decrease your security because strangers are going in and out of the building.

I do not understand the argument for an entire building. If I own a building, it should be my right to decide who stays there. As long as the airbnb guests are not throwing wild ragers, I don't see what argument the neighbors could have.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by ceejayoz on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @02:16PM (#9540901)
> If people are buying whole buildings to rent out, what argument do the neighbors have for shutting down airbnb activity?

Most cities require hotels go through a permitting and approval process, usually in part to ensure things like security, parking, etc. are accounted for, and only allow them in certain areas zoned for such commercial usage.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by Mikeb85 on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @02:20PM (#9540931)
> I do not understand the argument for an entire building.

Then you're running a hotel. And there are rules for that. Including zoning restrictions.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by wlesieutre on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @05:46PM (#9542172)
Right, residents of adjacent (or even nearby) properties would have an issue with it. Same as if I bought an apartment building and started using it as a factory. It's exactly why we have zoning.

A whole rented building has the same problems (loud guests, people abusing shared spaces, etc) as a single apartment rented to short-term guests, but on a larger scale.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by geebee on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @07:37PM (#9542690)
Think of it this way: I would like to trade my right to run a hotel out of my house in exchange for a legally enforced expectation that my neighbors won't do this either. This is the kind of neighborhood I would like to live in. I don't demand that every neighborhood be like this, but it's what I choose for myself.

Yes, this will require some restrictions on how people can use their properties in some places. Keep in mind, though, that this arrangement is only possible with some sort of law or community regulation. Without this, any single individual can come in and deny this choice to everyone else living there.

I'd say that if it is very important to you to be able to short term rent your apartment or house, you should buy one in a community where it is legal. You should not impose this choice on neighbors who chose to live where it is not legal.