Re:Guide for Technical Development
by TheBeardKing on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @10:28AM
(#9531971)
I don't know, I don't view Google as having the same level of perfection as, say, Apple. I know when I use Google products, almost infinitely in beta, there's going to be some things lacking and unpolished. Helpful yet unfinished, you take what you get.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Perfection is one thing. But this is a page on their website trying to help them recruit for engineers? Shouldn't that have a bit of a higher standard?
all of these comments about non trivial matters are bike shedding. even this comment, its only increasing entropy, your missing the forest for the trees.
Re:Guide for Technical Development
by itsybitsycoder on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @12:08PM
(#9532737)
@rockdiesel, it's definitely "for" the trees, where "for" means "because of". You can't see the forest (big picture) because you're paying too much attention to the individual trees (details).
If the "reply" link is unavailable you can click on the time to be able to reply directly.
Re:Guide for Technical Development
by rockdiesel on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @02:49PM
(#9533989)
That makes sense. Thank you for your explanation.
Trivial, not non trivial.
Re:Guide for Technical Development
by rockdiesel on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @12:02PM
(#9532698)
Off-topic, but I always thought it was "can't see the forest through the trees" not "forest for the trees".
Meaning someone can't see passed what is in front of them (trees/treeline) to see the bigger picture (forest).