News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Freightliner Inspiration Truck Unveiled at Hoover Dam by gambiting on Thursday May 07, 2015 @09:23AM (#9504826)
>> And judging by some of the latest plane crashes, a complete autopilot may not be that bad of an idea

Well no - the problem with problems is that you can never predict all of them, and complete autopilot would either need to exhibit strong AI to deal with all(not possible right now) or have them all coded in(also not possible). Not to mention that complete power loss can, and has happened before - even if the steering still has power, without a computer running it won't do much good without someone who can move the stick. Or look at the landing on the Hudson River - would any computer ever decide to try it? I think the answer is no. If we had a ridiculously good AI, I think it would decide to crash land the plane somewhere with no people. River has people. There were bridges in the way. AI might not be 100% capable of gliding the plane with no engine trust and broken sensors -it would have simply not tried that landing. That plane only landed safely because the captain had experience with gliders and knew what to do.

Re:Freightliner Inspiration Truck Unveiled at Hoover Dam by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 07, 2015 @09:52AM (#9505004)
The perfect is the enemy of the good.

It's not like all pilots without that much glider experience are 'unsafe' because they can't recover in that extremely particular set of circumstances.

Even if we ignore the possibility of remote control, you don't need an autopilot that's better in every way than every existing pilot. You just need one that's better than the average pilot.

Re:Freightliner Inspiration Truck Unveiled at Hoover Dam by gambiting on Thursday May 07, 2015 @10:03AM (#9505092)
That is just deeply untrue. Even if automatic pilots had statistically less accidents than real ones, any accident caused by machine error would be greatly publicized, and manufacturer of the autopilot would have to pay $$$ in damages.

Let's use a different argument, just for the sake of it. Let's assume there exists a medical device, which never fails on its own, but due to operator errors 1/10000 patients who use this machine die.

Now someone makes a fully automated machine,but due to problems with programming it kills 1/100000 patients it treats(completely on random). Even though it's 10x better than your average operator, such machine would be banned from the market quicker than you can say "litigation". In our society human errors are much more easily forgiven than computer errors, because everyone believes that they could have been prevented. And therefore, a truck autopilot wouldn't need to be just better than your average driver - it would need to be absolutely perfect. And I don't think we are ready for perfect yet.

Re:Freightliner Inspiration Truck Unveiled at Hoover Dam by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 07, 2015 @10:09AM (#9505125)
People are stupid, but insurance companies are less stupid. It can be made to work, you just need enough of a profit potential for people to put up with the hassle.