News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet?. Parent comment

Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by simonh on Thursday May 07, 2015 @07:01AM (#9504169)
They are hard to build because once the chain raction starts in the nuclear material, the resulting reaction tends to break up and disperse the nuclear material before the chain reaction progresses very far. It's called a fizzle. Fission bombs are designed with a wrap-around concave shaped charge of conventional explosive around the nuclear material. This is detonated as the critical mass of nuclear material is slammed together, and the compression wave from the conventional explosion holds the fissioning mass of nuclear material together long enough for the chain reaction explosion to complete. The engineering for this and the precise timing and controll of the detonation sequence is extremely hard.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by ptaipale on Thursday May 07, 2015 @07:15AM (#9504232)
My understanding is that the engineering for this can be done by someone who has studied the stuff, and uses publicly available materials. He or she does need to be competent but does not need to be Einstein. See John Aristotle Phillips. [0]

The main challenge is simply the industrial process required to collect the fissionable material. That is why Iranians have centrifuges and why Stuxnet attacked those centrifuges. [1]

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Aristotle_Phillips

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by coob on Thursday May 07, 2015 @07:48AM (#9504366)
For a fission bomb yes, not s fusion (thermonuclear/hydrogen) bomb.

Fire bombing can (and has done) more damage to a city than a fission bomb.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by Houshalter on Thursday May 07, 2015 @10:09PM (#9509646)
But a terrorist can't fire bomb a city, but they can potentially build a fusion bomb.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by ptaipale on Saturday May 09, 2015 @02:24AM (#9515711)
A terrorist can't really build a fusion bomb, because you need a government to support the infrastructure. But the fear is not entirely unjustified because a government would be able to give the bomb to a terrorist who then uses it. Or perhaps a government employee might steal it (for bribes) and give to a terrorist. So I can imagine terrorist having a small fission bomb. But I cannot imagine an arrangement where a terrorist would acquire a fleet of B-29's that could be used to fire-bomb a city.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Hasn’t the World Been Destroyed in a Nuclear War Yet? by Houshalter on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @12:44AM (#9529650)
To build it from scratch yes, it's possible to build a primitive bomb from stolen refined plutonium. After the collapse of the soviet union, a lot of it went missing and there a dozen cases of people getting caught trying to sell it on the black market (and those are just the people that've been caught.)

Mass arson is possible, though not on the scale of firebombing. The US in WWII developed the idea of strapping incendiary bombs on bats and releasing them in a city, where they would roost in random buildings and start hundreds of small fires.

[ Parent | on HN ]