Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, Not Just Machines

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by nightski on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @02:51PM (#9494218)

Article was pretty disappointing. It's not that he did not make valid (although general and vague) points, but the question "Why deep learning is a mandate for humans" was not answered in a satisfying manner at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by trendroid on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:01PM (#9494597)

Before reading, I did ctrl+f for the keywords in the title and straight away realized it will be misleading. Wasn't proven wrong and hence not disappointed. For some reason, I was hoping to find some hack on learning better

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:12PM (#9494664)

The hack, though not stated, seems to be visit coursera and start learning or start machine learning :) which is a current course by Ng.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by rndn on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:14PM (#9494670)

I was similarily disappointed by the AMA. It didn't reveal anything new and just sounded like someone selling deep learning technology.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by visarga on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @11:44PM (#9496498)

Haven't you heard? They discovered "deep learning for humans". It's called Coursera. Now, deep learning can be a mandate for both humans and machines.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Andrew Ng: Why 'Deep Learning' Is a Mandate for Humans, N... by mkagenius on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @03:46PM (#9494514)

Yeah, do they choose title for the article even before the interview, these days?

[ Parent | on HN ]