Re:Subway station toilets: a surprisingly accurate indicator...
by rwmj on Tuesday April 14, 2015 @03:46AM
(#9372692)
I'm having a hard time understanding what's bad about this. If they are otherwise unemployable, then it's good that they are doing this isn't it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Subway station toilets: a surprisingly accurate indicator...
by crdoconnor on Tuesday April 14, 2015 @04:14AM
(#9372797)
What's bad is that they are often nearly disabled, and if they don't do this, they starve.
No social security for the elderly in Singapore.
Re:Subway station toilets: a surprisingly accurate indicator...
by lmm on Tuesday April 14, 2015 @03:51AM
(#9372711)
If they're not doing anything actually productive, wouldn't it be better to pay them the money and let them spend the time on something they enjoy?
Re:Subway station toilets: a surprisingly accurate indicator...
by ghshephard on Tuesday April 14, 2015 @04:32AM
(#9372856)
Singapore Cleanliness is a huge mental relief after having to deal with the disgusting mess that various parts of San Francisco are. Keeping this city/state clean is incredibly productive. There is a reason why a story regarding hiring cleaning consultants makes the front page news, and people are fined $15,000 for throwing out cigarette butts - singaporeans take cleanliness very, very seriously.
Re:Subway station toilets: a surprisingly accurate indicator...
by otterley on Tuesday April 14, 2015 @04:11AM
(#9372784)
Cleaning toilets isn't productive labor?