Re:Simple apply/filter/reduce package in Go
by drcode on Friday April 03, 2015 @02:34PM
(#9317548)
> They actually degrade performance in the absence of a particularly smart inlining compiler.
So it sounds like you're saying that iterators in Rust are faster than transducer-based filter/reduce.
I think it's clear that my original point was that transducer-based filter/reduce is faster than lazy-list based filter/reduce, and comparable in performance to a for loop. (in that lazy-list operations are MUCH MUCH slower in most cases for filter reduce operations than the latter two approaches)
So it sounds like you're saying that iterators in Rust are faster than transducer-based filter/reduce.
I think it's clear that my original point was that transducer-based filter/reduce is faster than lazy-list based filter/reduce, and comparable in performance to a for loop. (in that lazy-list operations are MUCH MUCH slower in most cases for filter reduce operations than the latter two approaches)