News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$149 Chromebooks by ntakasaki on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @04:51PM (#9299800)
>Chromebook sales are constantly rising

Where are the real shipping numbers from Google then? Surely they must know the numbers? Why won't they release it then? The only reason I can think of could be that they aren't all that great.

Re:$149 Chromebooks by Mikeb85 on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @05:03PM (#9299869)
You do realise that Asus, Lenovo, HP, etc... sell Chromebooks, right? Google sells very few branded as a 'Google' product.

The numbers are out there, but Google isn't releasing numbers because they're a tiny vendor.

Re:$149 Chromebooks by ntakasaki on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @05:08PM (#9299898)
You mean Google does not know exactly how many Chromebooks are being sold by Asus, Lenovo, HP, etc?
Re:$149 Chromebooks by Mikeb85 on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @05:52PM (#9300145)
They probably do, but all those are public companies. They all report sales a certain way. Google isn't going to mess with reporting sales that other companies are making. That's irresponsible.
Re:$149 Chromebooks by jhall1468 on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @05:51PM (#9300143)
No. Why would they? You think Asus, Lenovo and HP are giving sales data to Google?
Re:$149 Chromebooks by jeromegv on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @06:53PM (#9300444)
They do know about Android activations, it's not so far fetched.
Re:$149 Chromebooks by robotresearcher on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @02:46AM (#9302000)
All the Chromebooks phone home regularly checking for updates, etc. Google knows exactly how many have been used and are in use now.
Re:$149 Chromebooks by acchow on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @05:17PM (#9299962)
I don't have a Chromebook, but I think you have to sign into a Google account to use a Chromebook, so surely they have the numbers?
Re:$149 Chromebooks by kaared on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @07:37AM (#9302878)
You can use it in guest mode without a Google account or other authentication. I don't remember if you need to explicitly set it up to do that, though.

I'm sure Google has the numbers since the Chromebooks/Chromeboxes auto-update (part of the whole point, really) so given that they likely have unique device IDs (or ethernet MAC addresses), the 'live devices count' would be rather easy to figure out.

Re:$149 Chromebooks by scholia on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @06:07PM (#9300234)
"Chromebooks in Q3 2013 had at best a 1.2 percent share of the PC market and a 0.76 percent share of the combined PC-tablet market."

Latest IDC figures show Chromebooks continue to struggle http://www.zdnet.com/article/latest-idc-figures-show-chromeb...

Re:$149 Chromebooks by mkozlows on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @07:19PM (#9300544)
Q3 2013 is a long time ago. According to NPD, Chromebooks had 14% market share in 2014, counting retail and commercial (read: education) channels. Growth was up 85% year over year, too, which is amazing in the context of a stagnant/declining laptop market.

http://betanews.com/2015/02/24/2015-is-year-of-the-chromeboo...

Re:$149 Chromebooks by scholia on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @10:30AM (#9303831)
NPD is a less reliable source covering a much smaller market (not that any of them are reliable).
Re:$149 Chromebooks by scholia on Thursday April 02, 2015 @11:50AM (#9311437)
Chromebook sales are about 1% of all PC sales, says ABI Research http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/22/chromebook...

Different source, different paper, different journalist, same conclusion.

The idea that Chromebooks sell in volume is delusional, at this point, and downvotes won't make it any less delusional.

Re:$149 Chromebooks by Mikeb85 on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @07:27PM (#9300572)
You can spin it all sorts of ways. Keep in mind the 'PC' market includes all those legacy Windows XP computers which are languishing in peoples homes, businesses, corporations, etc...

Chromebook sales are a much bigger part of current PC sales. And vendors do keep expanding their Chromebook lines. If it was a failure they wouldn't.

Re:$149 Chromebooks by millstone on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @12:58AM (#9301714)
The "PC market" refers to current sales. "Installed base" is the term for the metric that includes the languishing WinXP machines.
Re:$149 Chromebooks by Mikeb85 on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @09:41AM (#9303413)
Ah yeah you're right. The 1% came from some guy extrapolating Samsung's sales of Chromebooks to mean the whole Chromebook market...
Re:$149 Chromebooks by scholia on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @10:33AM (#9303857)
Some guy being a professional journalist who actually made some effort to analyze the numbers.

I appreciate from the downvotes above that some people prefer to believe what they want to believe ;-)