News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Dash Button by ovi256 on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @11:43AM (#9297120)
>Everything comes in a packet from a trusted brand who is taking are of you.

And how is this different from the present ? Everything comes non-packets ? From an untrusted brand ? That dystopian future sounds better somehow.

Re:Amazon Dash Button by aendruk on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @02:05PM (#9298566)
> Everything comes in non-packets? From an untrusted brand?

Close; bulk ingredients and reusable containers, from a minimally branded supplier to which I have no loyalty.

Re:Amazon Dash Button by untog on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @11:52AM (#9297214)
Even Amazon have their own "Amazon Basics" brand. When it comes to paper towels you really don't need a brand sponsored button.
Re:Amazon Dash Button by guan on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @12:06PM (#9297377)
I’d like an AmazonBasics button.
Re:Amazon Dash Button by afandian on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @12:04PM (#9297345)
Depends on your present. I like to make a choice before buying things. Especially coffee.
Re:Amazon Dash Button by quadrature on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @12:32PM (#9297628)
So then you don't get the coffee button. There are a set of products where selection isn't important or where you have brand loyalty (detergent is an excellent example).
Re:Amazon Dash Button by tdaltonc on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @12:58PM (#9297886)
That sounds exhausting. I need my decision-making-juice[0] for more important things.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_depletion#Consumer_behavior

Re:Amazon Dash Button by afandian on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @06:10PM (#9300252)
Interesting link. Suggests that presenting unnecessary choice leads to passive behaviour. I'm thinking of active choices rather than seeing a row of a dozen different identical kitchen towel brands at the supermarket. Like, what are the ethical standards of this shop, how does it treat it's suppliers, does it exploit it's workforce etc.

Every decision is important, and every time it is automated for the sake of convenience is a little bit of disenfranchisement.

Again, it depends what you consider important. Purchasing decisions arguably dictate much transnational economic concerns. For example palm oil, the fair trade movement. As a global citizen I would say that was well spent decision juice.

I'm sitting higher up on my high horse than I started, but discussions tend to polarise / crystallize views!