News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Mercedes Robo-Car That Made Me Want to Stop Driving by ghshephard on Monday March 30, 2015 @03:56AM (#9288149)
Google's cars are programmed to break the law in a number of scenarios. They will inch into an intersection if they don't sense that another car is going to take advantage of their right of way. They will speed faster than the posted limit if they sense that cars are traveling faster than that limit.

Obeying the law, in some scenarios, particularly when you might force people to make lane changes (which are dangerous in and of themselves) results in greater fatalities. In that situation, it makes sense to break the law.

Re:The Mercedes Robo-Car That Made Me Want to Stop Driving by tajen on Monday March 30, 2015 @04:11AM (#9288199)
Manual cars' speedometer "sticks" during an accident, so the police can see the actual speed at the time of impact. Who's responsible when a Google car has an accident while breaking the law?
Re:The Mercedes Robo-Car That Made Me Want to Stop Driving by prawn on Monday March 30, 2015 @04:29AM (#9288266)
Likely depends on who signed what, to what extent a manufacturer can deny responsibility, etc. Many people will hire cars rather than own them so it's likely that the taxi service will bear responsibility unless the passenger has meddled.