News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DemocracyOS by striking on Saturday March 21, 2015 @06:29PM (#9244457)
What about the monitoring and modification of online communities by the GCHQ? This doesn't even look resistant to that.

Also, what about traditional ballot stuffing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_100#Hacking anyone?

I could only trust this if there were attached a mathematical proof of its usability. Otherwise, I kind of doubt it's worth anyone's time.

Re:DemocracyOS by piamancini on Saturday March 21, 2015 @07:16PM (#9244658)
We are working to validate democracyOS votes with the blockchain. Happy to listen to any other suggestions
Re:DemocracyOS by tebou on Saturday March 21, 2015 @09:22PM (#9245078)
Please check out: https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/security/2014/08/30/every-vote-count...

This is a paper describing an end-to-end verifiable self-enforcing electronic voting system called DRE-i (Direct Recording Electronic with Integrity).

In my opinion this is a superior solution to any other electronic voting system developed to date.

Re:DemocracyOS by piamancini on Sunday March 22, 2015 @01:32AM (#9245721)
Thank you!