News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by Retric on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @12:55PM (#9146010)
I think the focus on pheromones may be misleading. People can for example smell a buildup of uric acid which is a sign of disease and poorly functioning kidney's. So clearly people use sent clues even without pheromones.

PS: The perfume industry is $28.95 billion worldwide so the idea that people care about how others smell should be obvious. And not just women as men's deodorant is vary common.

Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by wtbob on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @06:17PM (#9148115)
> Not all of Dr Sobel’s observations make immediate sense. If the purpose of sniffing is to learn something about the person with whom you have just shaken hands then it would be expected that the hand sniffed was the one which did the shaking. That, though, was true only when the shakee was of the same sex as the shaker. Those who shook hands with someone of the opposite sex more often smelled the hand that had not done the shaking.

I think I have a hypothesis which fits that observation: when we shake hands with someone of the same sex, we want to evaluate that person, and so sniff his scent; when we shake hands with someone of the opposite sex, we are concerned that we're giving the best impression, and thus sniff her scent. We're subconsciously neurotic.

Alternatively, we're not attuned to the pheromones of a member of the same sex, so have to sniff our shaken hand to detect them; meanwhile, we can easily smell those of a member of the opposite sex in the air, and sniff our own scent in order to compare compatibility.

Other theories?

Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by simulate on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @05:48PM (#9147950)
"We are merely exchanging long protein strings. If can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSH88aE_ggQ
Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by madaxe_again on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @12:07PM (#9145659)
Perhaps Dr Sobel just smells funny...

As far as I'm aware, the handshake started as an impromptu dirk-frisk.

Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by ripter on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @12:34PM (#9145855)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handshake agrees with you (it's also what I had learned.)

We know people did it back in the 4th century BCE, so it's not a stretch to think that it might be a lot older than that. Old enough that it's just something we've always done, with no real idea as to why. So we make up reasons, like to show we are not armed.

Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by dreamweapon on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @02:17PM (#9146617)
BTW, we have the love the article's secondary title, clearly a reference to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smell_the_Glove

Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by avianbc on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @11:47AM (#9145514)
Print link?
Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by justzisguyuknow on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @11:49AM (#9145527)
Perhaps it's some way to avoid a paywall?
Re:Handshaking may be a chemical as well as a social greeting by sumitviii on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @01:43PM (#9146365)
Use incognito mode.