Hello,Recently I was thinking about Mandarin and I noticed that it has about 3 to 4 times the meaning density. Meaning that if a child studies in Mandarin for 15 years of her life, she could have learned as much as 75 years worth of knowledge (assuming that the teachers created a good curriculum).I wonder if the same is true for any artificial language. Is there a programming language with much...
I am posting this for several reasons.1. I don't like the original acronym as it leaves out Microsoft.2. Google renamed to Alphabet and Facebook renamed to Meta since then.3. I don't know if N stands for Nvidia or Netflix.What do we have now? Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Nvidia? Is it MMAAANN? or MAANMAN? What is it?
Hello, Seeing how most people who guess well if someone is lying do it from 'reading a face', it can be said that there must be auditory and visual cues in a person's expressions that reveal if someone is lying. Is it possible to create a lie detector just based on reading and processing someone's facial expressions and voice?This can have a lot of uses. Courts can know if a defendant is guilty...
Because it measures all the goods and services produced in a country over the course of an year.
I know of a way to inflate it as much you want, but I don't think I will ever be in a position to use it.
Go on. Argue that please.
You can post on multiple platforms, you know. Content creators aren't stupid. They post on whichever platform is buzzing. It's their day job and the most popular ones know what they are doing than any of us.
No one is stopping these nostalgic folks. Those older techs aren't banned. They have just lost their war for network effect.
Hello,I would like you guys to post ideas for technologies which still require more processing power than is currently available.
Maybe because the FR industry is the one that's delivering those death threats?
Or maybe what would be considered a mathematically conducive mindset is determined by whose mathematical tradition we are following? Maybe there exists a mathematical mindset out there where "domination and sacrificing" are the requirement for conductivity of ideas?
Maybe the peoples of the future will only consider one particular mathematician as the relevant one? Maybe like Turing, because most likely computers will become a greater part of the world at large? Maybe we see programmers the way people used to see scribes some time back?
Only for the later (even if major) part of his life. One could argue that the physicality he was capable of in the earlier stage of his life helped him gain a solid understanding of physics on our level.
But there is a better argument to be made: Modern Physics is an entirely different beast. To understand the underlying reality you have to be, in one sense of the word, be detached from the reality. And being paralyzed can be said to be one of the many things that let him have experiences unlike that of any almost any other human being. His earlier life let him have a solid footing on the dynamics of our level, and his later life allowed him to depart from it, in a direction in which he was propelled by his intellect.
I would argue that if Stephen Hawking was a sports instructor (or even a programmer for a sport software), his lack of physicality would have worked against him. But if you showed me someone with a severe physical disability who writes great code for sport software, I would revert to my first argument.
(I just explain what's in front of me! :P)
I agree with the thrust of your argument, but this itself is wrong. When the Europeans were figuring out complex gears and stuff, they thought that the brain is like a complex cog machine (that was when they thought that mind was different, I think). When fluid dynamics became the craze, they started comparing, brain to a machine that manipulates some fluid.
The truth is that we don't even have a model for it.
His idea makes sense.
~..death would take care of people who didn't know how to type..~ - Steve Jobs
All maths done till ~1600 AD could have been done in 50 years, if you see it from perspective of a civilization which has a stable existence. And forgetting all abstractions, stability of surrounding civilizations is basically a random phenomenon.
And I'm sure maths done in physics departments is beyond understanding of 80% people outside it, let alone any civilization which started 400 years before us.