Re:Microsoft to invest in Cyanogen
by Max_Mustermann on Thursday January 29, 2015 @08:38PM
(#8970027)
What were his arguments against Linux? I've never anyone actually speak ill of the concept of GNU/Linux, aside from "cookiness" and so.
It's GPL'd, and any GPL'd code "infects" any codebase it's merged with (unlike MIT/Apache license).
I don't really get why that's important. Just because the kernel is GPL'd doesn't mean the drivers, WM etc. have to be.
That's kinda been my vision for how Linux may succeed on desktops/laptops. The GPL'd Linux kernel with almost everything else closed source. I realize I'm just describing Android.
Re:Microsoft to invest in Cyanogen
by caryhartline on Thursday January 29, 2015 @09:49PM
(#8970215)
I think the "cancer" part has to do with the GPL.
Ten years ago my head would have imploded reading that. I remember distinctly balmer saying that linux was a cancer.