Re:Built on Sand: Singapore and the New State of Risk
by bretthopper on Saturday January 24, 2015 @03:40PM
(#8940932)
Artificial shore/land expansion is really interesting so I loved this article.
This article mentions illegal sand trade but doesn't go into much detail about sand theft.
In 2008 someone stole 500 truck loads of sand from a Jamaican beach. There's some details on that one and another in Hungary [1].
One question I wish this article addressed is what Singapore does with the land excavated from all its building developments.
In Toronto for example, our waterfront has been expanded for over 50 years with land excavated from digging down for building foundations. I believe it extends a kilometre more than the natural shoreline [2]. They even created a 5km long "spit" [3] to act as a breakwater.
And I'm sure this is common in a lot of bigger waterfront cities as well.
Re:Built on Sand: Singapore and the New State of Risk
by Punoxysm on Saturday January 24, 2015 @06:48PM
(#8941518)
After having a little patience to digest the stuffy academic language I realized something:
This is one of the craziest articles I have ever read.
It is like the premise of a sci-fi novel where future states slowly creep along by dredging and filling in land. But it's actually really happening at a scale beyond novelties like Dubai and non-contentious (at least internationally) expansions like Battery Park City.
Re:Built on Sand: Singapore and the New State of Risk
by lostlogin on Saturday January 24, 2015 @02:56PM
(#8940760)
>>Singapore, in keeping with its policy of transparency...<< Wow, straight face and all. Let's discuss freedom of speech, politics or any other human rights and see how transparent things remain.
This article mentions illegal sand trade but doesn't go into much detail about sand theft.
In 2008 someone stole 500 truck loads of sand from a Jamaican beach. There's some details on that one and another in Hungary [1].
One question I wish this article addressed is what Singapore does with the land excavated from all its building developments.
In Toronto for example, our waterfront has been expanded for over 50 years with land excavated from digging down for building foundations. I believe it extends a kilometre more than the natural shoreline [2]. They even created a 5km long "spit" [3] to act as a breakwater.
And I'm sure this is common in a lot of bigger waterfront cities as well.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach_theft [2] http://www.blogto.com/city/2011/07/that_time_toronto_filled_... [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Street_Spit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_Park_City
This is one of the craziest articles I have ever read.
It is like the premise of a sci-fi novel where future states slowly creep along by dredging and filling in land. But it's actually really happening at a scale beyond novelties like Dubai and non-contentious (at least internationally) expansions like Battery Park City.
The fact that sand-smuggling is a thing...
.6 miles is 1 kilometer. Why would you convert to imperial for one measure, but leave the second as metric?
A number of importers, including Singapore, consider the details of their sourcing to be confidential and a matter of national security.
As in, they won't even admit from where the sand is being imported.