Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by chris_wot on Saturday January 17, 2015 @05:51AM
(#8904062)
I once tried to find out on Wikipedia whether goldfish really have ten second attention spans. I learned that in Nix vs. Heddon the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a tomato is a vegetable, not a fruit.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by minikites on Saturday January 17, 2015 @08:42AM
(#8904315)
Also, X-men toys are "toys" not "dolls" because they're non-human. X-men fans got mad, heh.
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by bryanrasmussen on Saturday January 17, 2015 @11:42AM
(#8904690)
The X-Men are the next step in doll evolution.
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by chernevik on Saturday January 17, 2015 @02:59PM
(#8905333)
Would you please go back and find out about the goldfish? I'm curious, but fear I'd never come back if I went to look for myself.
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by pgy on Saturday January 17, 2015 @05:04PM
(#8905681)
Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldfish#Intelligence
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by chernevik on Saturday January 17, 2015 @06:51PM
(#8906031)
Thanks!
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by mikecb on Saturday January 17, 2015 @10:05AM
(#8904433)
Under a specific tax statute.
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by olalonde on Saturday January 17, 2015 @08:19AM
(#8904274)
Couldn't resist Googling that and there is indeed a Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden
Re:The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google
by ableal on Sunday January 18, 2015 @04:17PM
(#8908917)
Our tools have been shaping us for millennia, something that a story by Ted Chiang highlights nicely: http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/fall_2013/the_truth_of... (via HN this week).
Many years ago, someone wisely said that the problem was not computers thinking like people, it was people thinking like computers.