Re:Wolfram Alpha Miscalculates What Its iPhone App Should Cost
by tptacek on Sunday October 18, 2009 @09:25PM
(#889219)
That last sentence is misleading. The web app that they're interfacing is only free because they made the mistake of making it free. If this iPhone app was the only available interface to Alpha, and they hadn't blown their marketing wad on a huge marketing launch for the free web version, $50 wouldn't seem nearly as "unreasonable" as it does now.
Re:Wolfram Alpha Miscalculates What Its iPhone App Should Cost
by 10ren on Monday October 19, 2009 @04:12AM
(#889701)
Maybe it could have then been positioned as portable mathematica + cool data sets.
BTW: I don't get all the contempt for Wolfram. He's accomplished more than most (all?) of us. I think he's entitled to as many mistakes and delusions as it takes in between accomplishments. And we'd all do better if we followed his example, of optimistic experimenting.
Re:Wolfram Alpha Miscalculates What Its iPhone App Should Cost
by ovi256 on Monday October 19, 2009 @05:36AM
(#889775)
He's the last of many of a long tradition of mathematicians that thought their mathematical work to be the solution to everything. A bit grandiose in his claims.
Re:Wolfram Alpha Miscalculates What Its iPhone App Should Cost
by coderdude on Monday October 19, 2009 @11:39AM
(#890261)
I've read criticisms that he makes it appear as though certain ideas are of his own creation, but beyond that, I think the guy is quite brilliant. His work on cellular automata as Turing machines is very intriguing. I think more people should give him his due.
Re:Wolfram Alpha Miscalculates What Its iPhone App Should Cost
by DannoHung on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:46AM
(#889497)
They'd have to convince people that their "computation engine" was worth anything in the first place.
$50 for an unfeatured 'native' interface to a free web app?