News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by blueflow on Sunday December 21, 2014 @02:26PM (#8780609)
Science and Conservatism are partially exclusive. Science includes questioning knowledge, while conservatism means to keep (conserve) the current.

I still don't like how the article values that in a negative way.

Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by wyager on Sunday December 21, 2014 @02:42PM (#8780661)
>Science and Conservatism are partially exclusive. Science includes questioning knowledge,

What we call "liberalism" is not substantially more willing to question its beliefs than what we call "conservatism".

People who fall under the American political label "liberal" are almost as ideologically entrenched as those who fall under the label "conservative"; they just happen to stick to a slightly more modern set of arbitrary beliefs.

The people who really question the current political environment are almost always labeled as ideological extremists, which American liberals certainly are not.

Now, as for science, it seems to me that liberals are just as liable to believe in the stereotypical anti-GMO anti-gluten pseudoscientific rhetoric as conservatives are to believe in the stereotypical anti-evolution anti-climate-change pseudoscientific rhetoric.

Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by blueflow on Sunday December 21, 2014 @02:51PM (#8780692)
And i wasn't talking about liberalism, because it just kinda translates to 'movement for freedom', which could be a lot. I doubt its even mutually exclusive with conservatism.
Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by Varcht on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:06PM (#8780754)
Oh good, because as I view modern liberalism it leads to missive government and regulation...
Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by vixen99 on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:02PM (#8780739)
'Science and Conservatism are partially exclusive'. Your view is naive because it's uninformed as in 'conservatism means to keep (conserve) the current.'. Oh please, start with Burke and do some reading. Tons to do, evidently.
Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by MisterBastahrd on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:08PM (#8780763)
Because modern "conservatism" has anything to do with Burke's version. You have a future in comedy.
Re:How academia's liberal bias is killing social science by blueflow on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:30PM (#8780840)
> conservatism means to keep (conserve) the current

literally. What about a Latin dictionary instead of Burke?