News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by driverdan on Saturday December 20, 2014 @03:27PM (#8777811)
Anyone have an idea how much bandwidth NK has? How easy would it be for a large botnet to DDoS the whole country?
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by junto on Saturday December 20, 2014 @03:50PM (#8777890)

  Anyone have an idea how much bandwidth NK has? How easy 
  would it be for a large botnet to DDoS the whole country?

How ironic would that be? Anonymous gathers up all its 4chan script kiddies to LOIC NK, to save the face of a company that has systematically treated its customers like criminals, namely those script kiddies with their DRM'ed Playstations and Audio CDs and DVDs, whilst fancifully offering up their credit card details online to be hacked and dumped on black hat card trader websites.

Oh, yep. Sign me up to some of that illegal shit. /end sarcasm.

I genuinely find the suggestion to attack an entire countries internet infrastructure to be a poor idea, whoever they are.

Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by personjerry on Saturday December 20, 2014 @05:21PM (#8778155)
Ok, but you can also consider it from a theoretical point of view and try to think of the ramifications rather than simply dismiss it as impractical. Personally my hacker side finds the idea intriguing and I hope someone could answer this question.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by junto on Saturday December 20, 2014 @05:59PM (#8778262)
Agreed it is an interesting theoretical question.

But, sometimes theoretical questions have shaky moral ground, and more importantly, put stupid ideas in stupid people's heads.

Adam and Eve is probably the classic example.

Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by functional_test on Saturday December 20, 2014 @06:41PM (#8778387)
Avoiding questions because of theoretical potential outcomes of people knowing the answer is neither good nor useful. Knowledge is not implicitly dangerous or immoral.

Also, in this particular case, it seems that the people interested in that sort of thing could figure it out anyway. Obscurity isn't security.

Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by r109 on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:18AM (#8779264)
I disagree with junto, game theory; the probability of it happening is feasible. What's not to say it hasn't happened before?
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by droope on Sunday December 21, 2014 @12:40AM (#8779057)
> Knowledge is not implicitly dangerous or immoral

Good phrase!

Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by corin_ on Sunday December 21, 2014 @12:09PM (#8780179)
Sometimes I feel like half of my HN comments are about this guy, but Aaron Sorkin (writer/creator of A Few Good Men, The West Wing, The Social Network, and recently The Newsroom) wrote this line in a not-very-successful TV show 15 years ago called Sports Night, which is the same phrase but slightly nicer, and has stuck with me.

Dan is a TV host who did a Variety Fair interview in which he was semi-pro drug legalisation.

> Dan: The validity of your read on what most of the country thinks notwithstanding, Stanley.... Actions are immoral. Opinions are not. And I won't apologize for mine. Discussion is good, and for those of us fortunate enough to be the subject of magazine articles, it may be our responsibility from time to time to try and raise the level of debate.

Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by enneff on Saturday December 20, 2014 @07:14PM (#8778470)
Adam and Eve is a work of fiction.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by hintss on Sunday December 21, 2014 @02:14AM (#8779195)
which was the point.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by junto on Sunday December 21, 2014 @07:54AM (#8779624)
Thanks for pointing this out. I could quite easily have invoked Godwin's Law and used gas chambers as an example, but I chose the fictional example instead. It seems that many people missed that, since I appear to be getting down voted for it.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by AtmaScout on Monday December 22, 2014 @04:21PM (#8785306)
Wish I could downvote.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by driverdan on Sunday December 21, 2014 @03:27PM (#8780824)
I am genuinely curious. I am not suggesting anyone attack them.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by forensichell on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:27PM (#8778630)
It's not about Sony per say, its the fact that they fucked with Americans, which as a country, wasn't a good idea, im all about #northkoreaoffline
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by ratsmack on Saturday December 20, 2014 @07:02PM (#8778430)
I'm not sure what the intent of this post was, but why would we want to harm the people of North Korea when they are already oppressed by their government. I believe that most of the people living there just want to live in peace like the rest of us.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by slayed0 on Monday December 22, 2014 @03:20PM (#8784953)
The people being oppressed do not have internet access. Internet access is reserved for the upper echelons in NK.
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by forensichell on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:28PM (#8778633)
They should stand up and fight til the last man standing, at least if they want their internets back
Re:Scans of North Korean IP Space by matznerd on Saturday December 20, 2014 @06:55PM (#8778415)
They wouldn't run the botnet from their servers. Most botnets are slave machines that have been exploited with malware...