News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. Parent comment

Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by logicchains on Saturday December 20, 2014 @10:06AM (#8776759)
It is idiomatic in highly performance-sensitive Java code though. Hopefully it won't be necessary in Java 9 or 10 when unboxing support is brought in.

I've added a note regarding the change, but I'm off to bed in a moment (AEST timezone). I'll separate the Java versions tomorrow.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by exabrial on Saturday December 20, 2014 @10:54AM (#8776898)
You have a link to Java 9/10 class unboxing? I've been googling for it and can't find any information on it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by Dewie on Saturday December 20, 2014 @02:50PM (#8777692)
Have you googled something like value classes?
[ Parent | on HN ]