Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni...
by lispm on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:14AM
(#8776553)
Above Common Lisp version improves the runtime from 8.5 to 3.6 seconds in SBCL and from 30 seconds to 2 seconds in LispWorks 64bit. Computer: i7 Mac mini.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni...
by lispm on Saturday December 20, 2014 @06:29PM
(#8778353)
I've created a version with some explanations about performance issues...
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni...
by logicchains on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:21AM
(#8776570)
Nice, re-running the benchmark with the new code now.
*Edit: and, it's done.
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni...
by lispm on Saturday December 20, 2014 @10:06AM
(#8776760)
here is a much faster version:
https://gist.github.com/lispm/6066e1eeadf943910c47
You might want to adapt it...
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni...
by logicchains on Saturday December 20, 2014 @10:22AM
(#8776806)
I'm off to bed now, I'll pull it in the morning.