News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices by drcode on Saturday December 06, 2014 @08:14AM (#8709154)
I agree that stellar-like systems might have a role to play in the future, but surely a coin with an incident of corrupted transaction logs is inferior to one without such an incident, all else being equal.

EDIT:

To those pointing out the 2013 Bitcoin fork, good point.

However, in cryptocurrency land, 2013 is ancient history, and I'd argue standards are higher already.

Re:Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices by moreati on Saturday December 06, 2014 @08:27AM (#8709175)
Yes, but note that Bitcoin had a blockchain fork in 2013 http://bitcoinmagazine.com/3668/bitcoin-network-shaken-by-bl.... Without knowing the details of Stellar's fork I make no comment on the relative severities/merits.
Re:Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices by kolev on Saturday December 06, 2014 @08:33AM (#8709182)
Bitcoin had its incidents in the past as well!