Additionally: I personally hate the damn things. My kids love to get them because of the stupid surprise. Sometimes my daughter just ignores the chocolate completely. It's a bit of marketing akin to the McDonalds Happy Meal with the cheap plastic toy. A far greater injustice in the world is not being able to import prosciuttos and similar cured meats.
You really don't know how the US or guns work, do you?
http://www.snopes.com/info/news/uzi.asp
And this kind of thing is much rarer:
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/20/us/fsu-incident/index.html...
I'm from the US and know quite well how things work.
I'll also add this link, as I think it's an excellent, and nuanced view that a lot of people elsewhere don't know about or see:
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/04/gun...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-re...
> And US does not have a monopoly on stupidity
No, it doesn't. That's a universal thing.
It's an extremely narrow, decontextualized view of the situation. It's far more important to ask why people are violent than with what tool they perpetrate that violence. I would say our issue is not guns, it's our "War on Drugs" and our relative proximity to all of those nearly-failed-states in Central- and South America that rank higher than us in those categories that are the center for production of those drugs, and the cartels that control them.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/us/children-and-guns-the-h..., for instance
Well the former question is certainly a good one. Maybe you're right that it's the most important one.
However, tools matter too - a gun is a way more efficient way of killing a lot of people quickly than a knife is. Both are far more lethal than Kinder Surprise eggs.
I suspect that the weighting toward the Americas isn't that the Americas are more violent, but that the Americas happened to host the countries in the intersection of higher gun homicide rates and sufficient stability to collect and report meaningful statistics.
In the UK on the other hand it is the exact opposite. You can fill your own LPG tank no problem, but I have not seen any pistols with the locks on them, because "it would be dangerous, what if you leave it in and forget about it??". It's just a matter of interpretation, a thing that is seen as dangerous in one country is completely fine in another.
UK: It's illegal to sell washed eggs
US: It's illegal to sell unwashed Eggs
Spoiler: In the UK, we keep eggs outside the fridge, and with the natural protection on the eggs (Removed when washed), they tend to keep for weeks. In the US, they tend to keep eggs in the fridge.
Also a lot to do with how the chickens are kept. If you're not allowed to wash eggs (UK), it's more likely the chickens will be kept in sanitary, good conditions.OTOH, It's cheaper for the producer to keep chickens in worse conditions, wash the eggs removing the protection and make consumers keep eggs in the fridge!
USDA mandates egg washing to combat salmonella. But the washing process also destroys the egg's outer most protective layer, the cuticle. Thus American eggs must be refrigerated, unlike almost everywhere else in the world.
In the UK, all chickens are already vaccinated against salmonella so their eggs don't need to be washed, nor refrigerated. This has a couple of benefits:
1. The cuticle remains intact, thus the egg is naturally protected against contamination during transport and storage.
2. Refrigerated eggs undergo temperature swings during transport, causing moistures to collect, which could lead to harmful bacterial growth.
3. A botched washing job leads to excess moisture and thus bacteria growth, and is worst than no washing job at all.
That's why it's actually illegal for the farm to wash the eggs in the UK.
I'm sure a lot of it does have to do with conditions though. If you have to wash the eggs anyway, you can keep them in factory conditions, and wash off all the shit. If you're not allowed to wash the eggs, then you tend to be a bit more careful, and keep them in better conditions.