News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The First Rule of DevOps Club by e12e on Sunday November 09, 2014 @07:14PM (#8581391)
I think the example in TFA is great: I'm not likely to pick up a cute devops guy at a conference (seing as how I'm a straight male). Like it or not, language matters and it is deeply tied to the culture in which it has evolved. If we want to change our culture (to be less misogynistic), we'll have to change the language we use, to facilitate the thoughts we would like to think. It will involve trying out new terms, seeing which ones fit our meaning without being too corny.

As an aside: what is a devops guy/girl/individual anyway? Isn't the core of devops (as opposed to system administration/system development) a holistic approach where everyone has a responsibility for implementing the system as a whole, including both development and day-to-day operations? Hence:DevOps?

Re:The First Rule of DevOps Club by vacri on Sunday November 09, 2014 @10:19PM (#8581882)
You don't even need to make it sexual to highlight the difference. If you say "Can someone help the guy at reception?", most people would head to reception expecting a male.
Re:The First Rule of DevOps Club by Rapzid on Sunday November 09, 2014 @10:27PM (#8581894)
I'm not sure what culture you belong to, but my culture definitely does NOT hate women.
Re:The First Rule of DevOps Club by e12e on Sunday November 09, 2014 @10:51PM (#8581931)
Your culture inherited a language.
Re:The First Rule of DevOps Club by e12e on Sunday November 09, 2014 @11:29PM (#8582020)
I was considering an edit to the effect that misogynistic might be too strong a word -- but on reflection I realized that many (most?) cultures have quite recently (from the perspective of evolving language) either burned women alive as witches, or stoned them to death. So I don't think such a qualification would be warranted. Even if what I might have had in mind might more aptly be described as being "merely" oppressive towards women, rather than woman-hating.