News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more. Parent comment

Re:Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more by enos_feedler on Friday October 17, 2014 @03:27PM (#8472876)
How many production environments deploy all containers on a single host?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more by TheMakeA on Saturday October 18, 2014 @02:02AM (#8474743)
There's fig2coreos[1] which will translate your fig.yml into systemd files. Then you could deploy across a CoreOS cluster[2]. Pretty interesting.

[1] https://github.com/centurylinklabs/fig2coreos

[2] http://www.centurylinklabs.com/building-complex-apps-for-doc...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more by skrebbel on Friday October 17, 2014 @05:18PM (#8473434)
A lot? I Guess? Why not?

In fact, I'm amazed at the amount of businesses that don't. Half of what TechCrunch writes about is, in technical terms, Rails CRUD apps. Why would they need more than a single host in the first year?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more by Jare on Friday October 17, 2014 @07:02PM (#8473879)
Because hosts die.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fig 1.0: Boot2docker compatibility and more by Zariel on Friday October 17, 2014 @04:11PM (#8473078)
If your not then your missing out on utilising your resources, check out Mesos or Kubernetes for instance.
[ Parent | on HN ]