Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by tedunangst on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @10:27PM
(#8300560)
I've decided to eat eggs every other day, to balance out the reports that they're good and bad.
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by DigitalJack on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @10:42PM
(#8300605)
But do you eat the big endian first? Or the little endian?
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by FLUX-YOU on Thursday September 11, 2014 @07:08AM
(#8301863)
Grade A Jumbo Endian
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by enraged_camel on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:16PM
(#8300691)
I eat six eggs everyday and I haven't died yet. This clearly means science is wrong!
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by jonah on Thursday September 11, 2014 @03:15AM
(#8301277)
I'm hedging my bets, I eat only three a day. ;)
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by baddox on Thursday September 11, 2014 @01:57PM
(#8304052)
What is the fundamental difference between nutrition and something like evolutionary biology? With evolution, there are obviously a lot of people who don't believe it, but pretty much everyone (including the doubters) recognizes that the mainstream scientific consensus is that evolution is a correct theory.
So, is the difference that there isn't much consensus among scientists for nutrition, and if so, why not? It seems to me that a hypothesis like "salt consumption affects blood pressure" should be fairly straightforward to test.
Or is the difference that the public simply isn't aware of what the scientific consensus is regarding issues in nutrition?
Re:No Association Between Salt And Blood Pressure, Study Finds
by lesterbuck on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:50PM
(#8300788)
This seems like a fascinating book, written to a general audience. Alas, it is priced more like a textbook, way out of the range of the average public. What a shame it will have a very small reach.
It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't: Why Clinical Research Can't Guarantee The Right Medical Answers
"The truth is, few people know the first thing about clinical research. The public reads about a medical research project that announces unbelievable results for a miraculous drug. Some years later, another investigation completely wipes out those initial favorable findings. Hormones Cut Women’s Risk of Heart Disease (San Francisco Chronicle, 1994) Hormones Don’t Protect Women from Heart Disease, Study Says (Washington Post, 2001) The people are confused because we do not understand the process behind these conflicting results. Our health, and in fact, our very lives are dependent on clinical trials, but we know little about them. This book explains the issues the public needs to be aware of when it comes to clinical research. It uncovers the problems in medical investigations that can not be overcome no matter how much care and diligence medical researchers bring to a research project. The basic premise that drives the writing is that it is impossible for medical researchers to guarantee that they can get all the right answers from a single study. No matter how good the investigators are, no matter how well a study is planned, no matter how carefully the plans are executed and no matter how conscientiously the results are analyzed and interpreted – the answer may still be wrong. The deck is stacked against medical researchers and the public – you – should be skeptical of the results no matter how impressive they seem on the surface."