And yet the original pointed to an article that has a better overview, some details not in the one you changed it to, and more, actually contains the link that you've now set it to.

In short, you've replaced a link to an excellent overview that has a link to more material, with a less useful link. I know we have our disagreements, but this just seems out and out wrong. As I've said before, I find this immensely frustrating.

Ok, we've changed it back.

Please follow the HN guidelines and email us when you have a complaint about moderation. Procedural nitpicking in the threads makes them worse.