Show HN: LINQ for Go

Posted by aabalkan on Thursday August 07, 2014 @02:03PM
from the show-hn dept.

http://github.com/ahmetalpbalkan/go-linq

( 5 comments | 13 points | on HN )

Re:Show HN: LINQ for Go by suzuki on Friday August 08, 2014 @06:55AM (#8152249)

The 'LINQ for Go' passes around slices as sequences. It differs in both space and time complexities from the 'LINQ to Objects' in C#.

A rather proper LINQ implementation in Go is

http://www.oki-osk.jp/esc/golang/linq3/linq.go.html http://www.oki-osk.jp/esc/golang/linq3/linq_test.go.html

and its design and implementation are explained in

http://www.oki-osk.jp/esc/golang/linq3.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LINQ for Go by bsaul on Friday August 08, 2014 @08:44AM (#8152489)

I've read many compliments about LINQ and how it was something fundamentally more powerfull than just a sql wrapper ( i think i remembered the dreaded word "monad", but i'm not suree), but i haven't found any detailled analysis of the theory behind that technology.

Anyone got a link to something like that ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LINQ for Go by macca321 on Tuesday August 12, 2014 @08:36AM (#8167488)

This looks more like a list comprehensions library for Go than a LINQ library.

Actual LINQ is a lot more powerful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LINQ for Go by monoid on Friday August 08, 2014 @10:48AM (#8152993)

Didn't explore both in depth, but at first glance I prefer the GO underscore approach: https://github.com/tobyhede/go-underscore

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LINQ for Go by viggity on Thursday August 07, 2014 @09:40PM (#8151051)

I love everything linq. I love how I can be more expressive and do more with less. I'm assuming you've had exposure to C# otherwise you wouldn't have ported the main functionality over to Go. What are your thoughts - I know that Go has its special use cases but do you find that the more "verbose" nature of their lamdas junk up your code? Is the extra verbosity offset by Go's other redeeming qualities?

[ Parent | on HN ]