News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by x0x0 on Sunday July 27, 2014 @08:55PM (#8094564)
tl;dr:

Study attempts to determine whether high intensity training (HIT) consisting of 10 6-second sprints w/ a one minute recovery between sprints performed twice weekly improves metabolic health and decreases type 2 diabetes risk in untrained middle aged (35-58 y/o) people. It appears yes.

also, a bmi of 29 (yes, yes, all you bodybuilders and powerlifters and strongman I know all about it) is tubby but not quite obese. It's kind of shocking how little effort this is. [1] is a good visual illustration of what a 29bmi looks like

[1] http://www.fourhourfit.com/results-and-tracking/pat-p90x-res...

Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by doorhammer on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:10PM (#8094610)
Thanks for the summary; found it when I was looking up more info after looking at the other article (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8094119)

Most of the commentary from there probably pertains.

One thing I noticed in this study is that (unlike a few other articles where I couldn't find the primary sources), they didn't do a warmup period:

"The HIT training protocol was similar to that used previously by Jakeman et al. [20]. 16 sessions of HIT were spread over an eight week period, with one or two days of rest between each sprint. There was no warm-up or cool down in the training sessions. Each training session consisted of 10 repeated 6-s all-out cycling efforts against 7.5% of body weight for males and 6.5% for females (Monark peak bike Model 894E, Monark Exercise AB, Vansbro, Sweden), added to the bike once the participant was cycling at 100 rpm with 1 min of passive recovery between sprints." [emphasis mine]

Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by pangram on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:05PM (#8094594)
Yeah, I was surprised by the fact that such a short duration of exercise (11 minutes of exercise twice / week) could have such a large impact on health. I wish there were more details on how much exercise each group had before the study -- my question is whether HIT on its own is good enough, or does it require normal exercise as well?
Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by x0x0 on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:06PM (#8094597)
participants where untrained
Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by Dewie on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:10PM (#8094614)
Conventional wisdom says that you're not really working out unless you spend 10-25 minutes on warm up, an hour or more on working out, and some stretching to finish off and/or a cool down. That isn't even counting the time to go to the gym or the park, or the shower afterwards. No wonder people are inactive.
Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by tinco on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:22PM (#8094652)
What conventional wisdom is that? The standard for warm up is 5 minutes isn't it? And a standard work out is 20-25 minutes as far as I'm aware. You can do a whole work out in 30 minutes.

My runs are 5 minutes warm up, I spend those 5 minutes walking to get from my house to a park, then 20-25 minutes running around the park (c25k plan) and then 5 minutes of walking back. You can fit that into almost any part of your day.

Re:High Intensity Training Improves Health, Physical Functio... by azatris on Monday July 28, 2014 @02:01AM (#8095421)
What about dressing up for the jog and afterwards showering and dressing up again? Also most people don't have a park in a 5 minute walking distance. I would say for most people they take 10-30 minutes to get to the training place, train at least 20 minutes and then 10-30 minutes back again and then 5-10 minutes of shower. Now that is quite a large part of the day.