Re:Amazon Tests ‘Kindle Unlimited,’ a Netflix for Ebooks and...
by Eric_WVGG on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @02:37PM
(#8043699)
That was the argument for music subscription services. $10/month for practically-unlimited music sounds bananas on the surface, but they're making more money than the 2-4 albums a year most people bought back in the glory days of CDs.
Re:Amazon Tests ‘Kindle Unlimited,’ a Netflix for Ebooks and...
by dublinben on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @02:29PM
(#8043646)
Nobody who reads two books a year is going to sign up for this service. Only people who read more than $10 of books per month are going to sign up.
Unlike prime, heavier users don't bring any additional revenue with this program. Prime members spend hundreds of dollars more per year than non-prime customers.
Re:Amazon Tests ‘Kindle Unlimited,’ a Netflix for Ebooks and...
by eggoa on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @02:57PM
(#8043845)
Plenty of people (such as myself) find themselves buying several actual hard-copy books a year only to read two or three of them. It's definitely not rational -- maybe call it aspirational.
Re:Amazon Tests ‘Kindle Unlimited,’ a Netflix for Ebooks and...
by WalterBright on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @03:39PM
(#8044052)
I buy grab-bag boxes of scifi books from ebay. I can't possibly read them all. There's nothing rational about it :-)
I'm guessing Amazon has enough data to know that this will end up profitable for them. In a way, it's just like Prime. Some probably order a ton of stuff every month, becoming unprofitable Prime members for Amazon, while others only a couple of year, yet still pay $99 a year for free shipping.
It's only like any other "unlimited" deal out there. Some customers will be very unprofitable as they will take full advantage of the "unlimited" offer, but the vast majority of the customers will more than make up for it.