There could have easily been a small fact or incident in the past with the author of the article that raised a red-flag for the agents. There could be a policy that says ALL tips must be followed up on and contacted.
I'm all for exposing and preventing abuses of power by law enforcement, but I see no evidence of that happening in this situation.
If the FBI investigates 500,000 people and prevents a single instance similar to the photo below, is it worth it?
http://11even.net/wp-content/uploads/World-Trade-Center-2002...
There have been plenty of attacks stopped http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States
There is always the possibility of something even worse happening. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_terrorism
A notable incident from 2013: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-foils-plot-build-strange-...
I'm sorry if this sounds like fear-mongering, these things do happen though.
What I'm talking about is an 80 year old guy who is well documented for professionally photographing public art.
When they saw someone taking pictures of that piece there could be a couple reasons: A) he's scoping it out to come back later and lob an RPG at it, B) he's working on the second edition of his book you can buy on Amazon.
They don't need to talk to the guy to find out which one it is. That's what I'm saying.
The FBI just aren't bright enough to do a cursory Google search, because they 'have all the info anyways'.
It's simpler than "Oh, but maybe they saw he was part of some obscure group in the 60s...". They probably just aren't very good at what they do, but with almost unlimited power it's hard for other people to see how shit you are at your job, as an organization and as a person.