News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JavaScript Modules by oblio on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @04:57AM (#7975868)
Well, back off from your Javascript knowledge a little and try to figure out if the intention of the code is readable.

As an outsider is seems... cryptic.

Re:JavaScript Modules by xionon on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @08:08AM (#7976406)
That, and it was a chance to reference an Achewood comic, instead of an XKCD one

http://achewood.com/index.php?date=07052007

Re:JavaScript Modules by Touche on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @09:20AM (#7976766)
It's definitely cryptic but stuff like this always happens in dynamic languages. They couldn't have created a process.thisIsNodeJS_NoForRealItIs because anything could fake it. My making it part of the toString it can't be overwritten.
Re:JavaScript Modules by voyou on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @09:45AM (#7976898)
Who cares if it's being "faked", though? The code should just check directly for the existence of process.nextTick, not use a bunch of obfuscatory nonsense to check that the string representation of some object matches some arbitrary string from which you might be able to conclude that you're running on node, from which you can then conclude that you might have access to process.nextTick.
Re:JavaScript Modules by Touche on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @10:55AM (#7977314)
Because Node doesn't own process.nextTick. It's valid for a library to create one in the browser. If I'm writing JS that can be run in Node or the browser I want to know if it's REALLY IS Node or not.