Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
by anigbrowl on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:09PM
(#790420)
Loftus and Matt Buchanan are quite good. I hope they'e getting paid a lot, because being associated with the likes of Jesus Diaz is not what I'd call a career- or even life-enhancing.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @06:03PM
(#790212)
Have you read the comments on gizmodo?
They're trying? Trying what? What they usually do is copy-paste from the source. That does not add much value. Hence, I ask again: where's the URL to the original press release? I don't want to read such great news from a website that allows comments from retards who know nothing about Physics...
I have an easy win for you. Stop reading the comments! They are almost universally awful.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:39PM
(#790473)
True. But would it be too far-fetched to claim that the quality of a website / blog can be indirectly measured by the quality of its comments? A quality blog should not tolerate certain comments which are more appropriate for YouTube.
Sigh, when you find the answer to that question, let me know ...
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @09:45PM
(#790540)
They will never sell Chanel No. 5 in gas stations because it would cheapen it. Likewise, a blog that tolerates retarded trollish comments looks cheap. If I were one of the IBM scientists who worked on that project, I would hate to have my work publicized by a blog as distasteful as Gizmodo.
Call me elitist if you will. BTW, my question was rhetorical.
Cut them some slack. At least they're watching/trying. Their article is a news item here, after all.