News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @05:43PM (#790157)
Where's the URL to the original IBM press release / article? I would rather read the news from the source, than from those gizmodo subhuman morons any day...
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by hy3lxs on Thursday August 27, 2009 @06:18PM (#790245)
Some links closer to the point of origin:

Pentacene on flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/ibm_research_zurich/3839799374/

IBM Research Zurich (pix of lab) - http://www.flickr.com/photos/ibm_research_zurich/

Article in MIT Tech Review - http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/24040/

"The imaging work is described today in the journal Science."

Fun search result on www.sciencemag.org for ibm+zurich

Science 10 July 1987 - 'IBM's Zurich Lab Is "Flower" in Europe: Two major discoveries—the scanning tunneling microscope and superconducting ceramics—highlight IBM Zurich lab's success in tapping Europe's scientific talent'

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @06:34PM (#790274)
Thanks for the links. Much appreciated.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Thursday August 27, 2009 @05:57PM (#790199)
"I would rather read the news from the source, than from those gizmodo subhuman morons"

Cut them some slack. At least they're watching/trying. Their article is a news item here, after all.

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by anigbrowl on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:09PM (#790420)
Loftus and Matt Buchanan are quite good. I hope they'e getting paid a lot, because being associated with the likes of Jesus Diaz is not what I'd call a career- or even life-enhancing.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @06:03PM (#790212)
Have you read the comments on gizmodo?

They're trying? Trying what? What they usually do is copy-paste from the source. That does not add much value. Hence, I ask again: where's the URL to the original press release? I don't want to read such great news from a website that allows comments from retards who know nothing about Physics...

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Thursday August 27, 2009 @07:40PM (#790391)
I have an easy win for you. Stop reading the comments! They are almost universally awful.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:39PM (#790473)
True. But would it be too far-fetched to claim that the quality of a website / blog can be indirectly measured by the quality of its comments? A quality blog should not tolerate certain comments which are more appropriate for YouTube.
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:57PM (#790492)
Sigh, when you find the answer to that question, let me know ...
Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @09:45PM (#790540)
They will never sell Chanel No. 5 in gas stations because it would cheapen it. Likewise, a blog that tolerates retarded trollish comments looks cheap. If I were one of the IBM scientists who worked on that project, I would hate to have my work publicized by a blog as distasteful as Gizmodo.

Call me elitist if you will. BTW, my question was rhetorical.

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Friday August 28, 2009 @05:50PM (#792358)
If you're elitist, it's in a good way. I agree.